[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#740051: marked as done (octave-signal: new upstream version desired)



Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:20:06 +0000
with message-id <E1WJ3gs-0003Au-Pa@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#740051: fixed in octave-signal 1.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #740051,
regarding octave-signal: new upstream version desired
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
740051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: octave-signal
Version: 1.2.2-1
Severity: wishlist

Hi, fist of all, thank you very much for taking care of Octave in Debian.
Your work is highly appreciated.

I would love to upgrade to octave 3.8, but there is one package that,
currently, is a blocker for me: octave-image.

octave-image is apparently compiled against octave 3.8, but I can't upgrade
my installation because some dependencies of octave-image (e.g.,
octave-signal) are only compiled for octave 3.6. Taking a look at

    http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-octave/octave-signal.git

I see that upstream's package 1.3.0 was already imported, which, according
to

    http://octave.sourceforge.net/signal/

is compatible with octave 3.8. There are some other packages that
octave-image depends on.  Is it only a matter of recompiling them?


Thanks in advance,

Rogério.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (150, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages octave-signal depends on:
ii  libc6           2.18-3
ii  libgcc1         1:4.8.2-16
ii  liboctave1      3.6.4-4+b2
ii  libstdc++6      4.8.2-16
ii  octave          3.6.4-4+b2
ii  octave-control  2.6.2-1
ii  octave-general  1.3.2-2
ii  octave-specfun  1.1.0-1

octave-signal recommends no packages.

octave-signal suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFCAAAA
http://cynic.cc/blog/ : github.com/rbrito : profiles.google.com/rbrito
DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: octave-signal
Source-Version: 1.3.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
octave-signal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 740051@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> (supplier of updated octave-signal package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:55:12 +0000
Source: octave-signal
Binary: octave-signal
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group <pkg-octave-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>
Description: 
 octave-signal - signal processing functions for Octave
Closes: 712079 740051
Changes: 
 octave-signal (1.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Rafael Laboissiere ]
   * Imported Upstream version 1.3.0 (Closes: #740051)
     + fir1 fixed for high order filters. (Closes: #712079)
   * Bump to Standards-Version 3.9.5, no changes needed
   * debian/patches/autoload-yes.patch: Refresh patch
   * Adjust build-dependencies to octave-pkg-dev >= 1.1.0 and
     octave-control >= 2.4.5.
 .
   [ Thomas Weber ]
   * debian/control: Use canonical URLs in Vcs-* fields
Checksums-Sha1: 
 0d3a3ec0f35d83ffd476588e7b0d4c166d834b13 2124 octave-signal_1.3.0-1.dsc
 007f2d574cc107a3ffb657c3242e97610056e33d 187502 octave-signal_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz
 b4f10b60b4f34f5a482aea08f26ea36d1f04a371 5236 octave-signal_1.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 8d5e34f77eda0dc2df53e10771a57f058395033f 191398 octave-signal_1.3.0-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 02572f481aeb4d4627d499ea30ec102dc70388a89998f6de075182ac815fd48d 2124 octave-signal_1.3.0-1.dsc
 2dc3ccb9e8472dcb0c4d663dc2caafd30d195c810915e13cf5df39b0f2a0b264 187502 octave-signal_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz
 47e2f5e5b9cb510d35de9f1c862a04e7c9e41e1bba998651b6b75a88758be733 5236 octave-signal_1.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 c81e7c3c6078ffe7032107d47814e627c6b160ef004cc085c25c8e82f9e238e4 191398 octave-signal_1.3.0-1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 cd5b581c428e2697c45dfccedfe44e79 2124 math optional octave-signal_1.3.0-1.dsc
 a0a420e2af7ad28cb9d54d57a3e74a95 187502 math optional octave-signal_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz
 fa01cd09fb009187bd1c66f8bd3e4544 5236 math optional octave-signal_1.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 66c1edcd0186aa5767718b912d93f627 191398 math optional octave-signal_1.3.0-1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=wRyP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: