Le samedi 22 février 2014 à 17:03 -0500, Mike Miller a écrit : > About 8 months ago on this list, it was decided that qtoctave shall be > removed once we have Octave with a native GUI packaged: > > Rafael wrote: > >* Sébastien Villemot <sebastien at debian.org> [2013-06-06 00:36]: > >> > >> Le mercredi 05 juin 2013 à 23:42 +0200, Thomas Weber a écrit : > >> > >>> which packages should we remove now after the release? I am aware of > >>> qtoctave and do plan to file a bug about it against ftp.debian.org. > >>> Any > >>> others? > >> > >> I think we should ask for the removal of qtoctave once octave 3.8/4.0 > >> (with GUI) is released, not before. > > > > Agreed. > > Even though the GUI does not come up by default, it is available, do we > agree that this transition the time for removal of qtoctave? I'm still a bit unsure. On one hand I'd really like to get rid of qtoctave (it is unmaintained), but on the other hand it's still working and I don't know if the native GUI is stable enough to replace it. -- .''`. Sébastien Villemot : :' : Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part