Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] questions on packaging an octave toolbox
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins
<jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jordigh@octave.org> wrote:
>> On 10 July 2012 17:41, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
>>> I'm trying to figure out the "Right" way to package a binary octave
>>> toolbox.
>>
>> Do you mean binary-only, no source?
>>
>> If so, there's no right way to do that, since that's a GPL violation
>> if you distribute it.
>
> No no. I just meant a package that provides binary oct files, instead
> of architecture-independent .m scripts. Obviously it would include a
> regular Debian source package.
>
> jamie.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-octave-devel mailing list
> Pkg-octave-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-octave-devel
Jameson,
Have you considered Octave Forge?
http://octave.sourceforge.net/
--
M. Sc. Juan Pablo Carbajal
-----
PhD Student
University of Zürich
http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/
Reply to: