Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] what replaces octave-depends?
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Rafael Laboissiere
<rafael@laboissiere.net> wrote:
> * kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> [2012-04-13 01:42]:
>
>> Trying to take a stab at transitioning fsl from octave 3.2 to octave
>> 3.6 (http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/octave.html).
>> Currently, it depends upon octave3.2-headers | octave3.0-headers. I am
>> thinking of changing this to liboctave-dev.
>
> Yes, this will be mandatory in wheezy, since we will request the removal
> of the octave3.2* packages.
>
This is a bit weird. Whatever changes I make to debian/control of fsl
package are lost when I do "debuild -us -uc". I think it is because
the package uses dh_gencontrol in the debian/rules. Can I simply
remove that or does it serve a greater purpose?
Sorry if this is a trivial question. I am still learning the ropes
here and I am not the original maintainer of fsl. Just trying to
provide two more hands for the octave transition.
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/
Reply to: