[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-octave-devel] unsubscribe





> From: pkg-octave-devel-request@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Subject: Pkg-octave-devel Digest, Vol 62, Issue 3
> To: pkg-octave-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 12:06:40 +0000
>
> Send Pkg-octave-devel mailing list submissions to
> pkg-octave-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-octave-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> pkg-octave-devel-request@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> pkg-octave-devel-owner@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Pkg-octave-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Any chance of getting 3.4 for squeeze? (Jordi Guti?rrez Hermoso)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 09:05:55 -0500
> From: Jordi Guti?rrez Hermoso <jordigh@gmail.com>
> Subject: [Pkg-octave-devel] Any chance of getting 3.4 for squeeze?
> To: Debian Octave Group <pkg-octave-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
> Message-ID:
> <[🔎] AANLkTi=MOaqyuCjoz1cjTeR75YnPfYr0TVpLNU5ug-Ek@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> jwe has set a few modest release goals for Octave 3.4, and they seem
> to be coming along. With some luck, 3.4 could get released in at most
> a couple of months. The squeeze freeze was just announced a few
> minutes ago, and it will probably last around 4 to 6 months, given
> past experience.
>
> Does this give us a chance to release 3.4 with squeeze? Or not enough time?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-octave-devel mailing list
> Pkg-octave-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-octave-devel
>
> End of Pkg-octave-devel Digest, Vol 62, Issue 3
> ***********************************************

Reply to: