Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Lenny is out, time for work

[Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com>]

Am Mittwoch, den 18.02.2009, 12:50 -0600 schrieb Jordi Gutiérrez
Hermoso:
> 2009/2/18 Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org>:
> > We might adopt the same policy as regards the other packages that Thomas
> > listed earlier in this thread, except for octave2.1 and octave2.1-forge,
> > which we decided to drop in lenny+1, a long time ago.
> 
> But octplot is already incorporated into Octave development sources,
> which will presumably get packaged for squeeze.
> 
> I don't use inline-octave or gpc to comment on those. What's the
> criterion *for* their removal?

cruft-removal. Unused code becomes buggy. The fact that no bugs were
reported against these packages in ages makes me suspicious that we
don't have any real users of them.

	Thomas