[Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#526799: marked as done (octave-graceplot: Please build-dep on grace6)
Your message dated Fri, 3 Jul 2009 08:31:14 +0200
with message-id <20090703063114.GA7922@atlan>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#526799: octave-graceplot: Please build-dep on grace6
has caused the Debian Bug report #526799,
regarding octave-graceplot: Please build-dep on grace6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
526799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526799
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: octave-graceplot
Version: 1.0.6-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
Can you please update the grace build-depends to grace6? Both grace and
grace6 are in the archive and are orphaned and it would be nice not to
carry both in the archive. octave-graceplot seems to build fine with
grace6 though I couldn't do much testing since I am not familiar with
octave-graceplot.
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian QA
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 04:39:32PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Thomas Weber wrote:
>> On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 12:02:09PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
>>
>>> Package: octave-graceplot
>>> Version: 1.0.6-2
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can you please update the grace build-depends to grace6? Both grace
>>> and grace6 are in the archive and are orphaned and it would be nice
>>> not to carry both in the archive. octave-graceplot seems to build
>>> fine with grace6 though I couldn't do much testing since I am not
>>> familiar with octave-graceplot.
>>>
>>
>> Uh, I'm confused. According to
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/grace6.html
>> grace6 was removed?
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>
> Yeah, I found out from the maintainer that grace6 wasn't really grace6
> so I think it will make more sense to just update grace to the current
> upstream. Sorry about that.
No problem, I'm hereby closing the bug.
Thomas
--- End Message ---
Reply to: