--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: qtoctave: Use the KDE science submenu instead
- From: Torquil Macdonald Sørensen <torquil@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:13:14 +0100
- Message-id: <20090130001314.5158.62405.reportbug@localhost>
Package: qtoctave
Version: 0.7.4+dfsg-3
Severity: minor
For me it seems more natural that qtoctave should be in the science
submenu, not the development submenu, on the KDE menu.
Best regards
Torquil Sørensen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages qtoctave depends on:
ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc1 1:4.3.3-3 GCC support library
ii libqt4-xml 4.4.3-2 Qt 4 XML module
ii libqtcore4 4.4.3-2 Qt 4 core module
ii libqtgui4 4.4.3-2 Qt 4 GUI module
ii libstdc++6 4.3.3-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii octave3.0 1:3.0.1-6lenny1 GNU Octave language for numerical
Versions of packages qtoctave recommends:
ii octave3.0-htmldoc 1:3.0.1-6lenny1 HTML documentation on the GNU Octa
qtoctave suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Torquil Macdonald Sørensen <torquil@gmail.com>, 513546-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#513546: Bug#513546: qtoctave: XFCE
- From: Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 18:51:17 +0200
- Message-id: <20090501165117.GD23297@atlan>
- In-reply-to: <20090425074552.GA8642@atlan>
- References: <20090130072857.4744.55978.reportbug@localhost> <20090412135401.GA16419@atlan> <20090425074552.GA8642@atlan>
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 09:45:52AM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 03:54:01PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 08:28:57AM +0100, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> > > Package: qtoctave
> > > Version: 0.7.4+dfsg-3
> > > Followup-For: Bug #513546
> > >
> > > Sorry, I meant the XFCE menu... :-)
> >
> <snip>
> >
> > So, I guess the desktop files is as good as it can be. Whatever a menu
> > manager makes out of that is out of our control.
>
> I intend to close this bug unless someone has a better idea on how to
> write the .desktop file.
Doing so now.
Thomas
--- End Message ---