Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Uploading the octave-forge packages
On 04/04/08 14:44 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > > 2) octave-special-matrix will be put on hold. As Thomas pointed out, this
> > > package is an overkill.
> >
> > How about adding the .m file to the miscellanous package?
>
> Yes, this was the original idea.
Okay, will do.
> > > 3) The debian/copyright must be extensively reviewed, in order to meet the
> > > Debian standards. Perhaps we could switch to the new proposed format [1]?
> >
> > I've started a review. How about a simple TODO file somewhere for
> > unclear files?
>
> What do you mean, exactly?
Keeping track of unkclear cases. For example, sample.wav in the audio
package lacks any license. Taking the DESCRIPTION as license source,
this would mean GPL-2+. That is not good, as we don't have the source
for the .wav file and I don't think someone created it with a hex
editor.
Thomas
Reply to: