Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] [RFU] octaviz 0.4.6+cvs20071225
Am Sonntag, den 06.01.2008, 23:19 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> * Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com> [2007-12-25 20:19]:
>
>
> > Source package (tar.gz) available from
> > http://alioth.debian.org/~thomas-guest/octaviz/octaviz-0.4.6+cvs20071225.tar.gz
> >
> > Please use SVN rev 1142.
> >
> > This switches to 3.0. The build system is not much faster than the old
> > one, but let's give it a try at the buildds.
>
> Build fails for me with this error message:
>
> /usr/bin/g++ -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -Wno-deprecated -o /home/rafael/devel/debian/PKGS/octaviz/octaviz-0.4.6+cvs20071225/build/Common/vtkRaiseWindow.oct /home/rafael/devel/debian/PKGS/octaviz/octaviz-0.4.6+cvs20071225/build/Common/vtkRaiseWindow.o -L/usr/lib -lX11 -lXt -L/usr/lib -lvtkCommon -lvtkCommon -lvtkFiltering -lvtkGraphics -L/home/rafael/devel/debian/PKGS/octaviz/octaviz-0.4.6+cvs20071225/build/Common -loctaviz -lvtkRendering -Wl,-rpath=/usr/lib/octaviz -L/usr/lib/octave-3.0.0 -loctinterp -loctave -lcruft -llapack-3 -lblas-3 -lfftw3 -lreadline -lncurses -ldl -lhdf5 -lz -lm -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/3.4.6 -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../../../lib -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../.. -L/lib/../lib -L/usr/lib/../lib -lhdf5 -lz -lfrtbegin -lg2c -lm
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rafael/devel/debian/PKGS/octaviz/octaviz-0.4.6+cvs20071225/build'
> [ 0%] Built target OctavizCommonFiles
> make[3]: Entering directory `/home/rafael/devel/debian/PKGS/octaviz/octaviz-0.4.6+cvs20071225/build'
> Common/CMakeFiles/Common.dir/build.make:927: *** missing separator. Stop.
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rafael/devel/debian/PKGS/octaviz/octaviz-0.4.6+cvs20071225/build'
> make[2]: *** [Common/CMakeFiles/Common.dir/all] Error 2
>
>
> File build/Common/CMakeFiles/Common.dir/build.make contains indeed several
> stanzas with strange line breaks between "/usr/bin/c++ -c -O2" and
> "-Wno-deprecated".
All right, I can see this in the amd64 chroot, too. It doesn't happen in
the x86 chroot, though.
I'll come back to you if I've fixed it.
Thomas
Reply to: