Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 23:04 +0200 schrieb Patrick Winnertz: > Package: octave2.9 > Severity: serious > Justification: Package content changed > Version: 1:2.9.13-1 > User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-debdiff > > Files in second .changes but not in first > ----------------------------------------- > /usr/share/doc/octave2.9-doc/interpderiv1.pdf.gz > /usr/share/doc/octave2.9-doc/interpft.pdf.gz > > Files in first .changes but not in second > ----------------------------------------- > /usr/share/doc/octave2.9-doc/interpderiv1.pdf > /usr/share/doc/octave2.9-doc/interpft.pdf > /usr/share/doc/octave2.9-htmldoc/interpreter/doc_002dunidcdf.html > /usr/share/doc/octave2.9-htmldoc/interpreter/doc_002dunidinv.html > /usr/share/doc/octave2.9-htmldoc/interpreter/doc_002dunidpdf.html As part of the 2.9.14 upload, I had a look at those. The problem with the pdf files is uh, strange: The first uncompressed pdf is less than 4k in size, so dh_compress ignores it. During the second run, it gains in size, so dh_compress compresses it. The reason for the growing can be seen by the attached two pdf files: the second one is in colour! So, it seems we regenerate these files and add colour to them. I'm not aware of any special options we used, so I'm open for suggestions. a) Do we want to have these plots with colour? b) How to simply deal with this inconsistency? Thomas
Attachment:
interpderiv1-1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
interpderiv1-2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document