[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#432420: matwrap: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin



Package: matwrap
version: 0.57-8
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070708
Justification: FTBFS on i386

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.

Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/matwrap-0.57/share/matwrap/Examples/simple'
perl -I../.. -w ../../../../bin/matwrap -language octave simple.h \
		-o simple_octave.cc -stub simple_stub.m
mkoctfile simple_octave.cc
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.1.3/backward/iostream.h:31,
                 from simple.h:1,
                 from simple_octave.cc:7:
/usr/include/c++/4.1.3/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2: warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 of the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the <X> header for the <X.h> header for C++ includes, or <iostream> instead of the deprecated header <iostream.h>. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated.
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [simple_octave.oct] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/matwrap-0.57/share/matwrap/Examples/simple'
error: `simple_octave' undefined near line 53 column 1
error: called from `print_str'
error: near line 8 of file `/build/user/matwrap-0.57/share/matwrap/Examples/simple/demo.m'
make: *** [build/matwrap] Error 1

The full build log is available from
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/07/08/

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems.

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |




Reply to: