* John W. Eaton <jwe@bevo.che.wisc.edu> [2007-04-10 15:18]: > I think this is unfortunate since Octave is useful on its own without > Octave Forge and I think 2.9.10 is much better than 2.9.9. A not-so-unrelated question: currently, the virtual package called "octave" in Debian depends on octave2.1. Should we change it to octave2.9? -- Rafael