Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Re: [prudhomm@debian.org: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] suitesparse and octave]

[Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org>]

* David Bateman <adb014@gmail.com> [2007-01-04 22:21]:

> Ok, my fault.. Although it currently checks in sparsesuite, as the new
> name is suitesparse that is in fact where it should check. This patch
> should fix that and address your problem..

Thanks for that.  Also, forget my question to you in my last post in this
thread.

As regards your patch:

> *** ./liboctave/oct-sparse.h.orig21	2007-01-04 22:19:32.188201467 +0100
> --- ./liboctave/oct-sparse.h	2007-01-04 22:19:14.618136917 +0100
> ***************
> *** 32,38 ****
>   extern "C" {
>   #endif
>   
> ! #if defined (HAVE_SPARSESUITE_UMFPACK_H)
>   #include <sparsesuite/umfpack.h>
>   #elif defined (HAVE_UFSPARSE_UMFPACK_H)
>   #include <ufsparse/umfpack.h>
> --- 32,38 ----
>   extern "C" {
>   #endif
>   
> ! #if defined (HAVE_SUITESPARSE_UMFPACK_H)
>   #include <sparsesuite/umfpack.h>
>   #elif defined (HAVE_UFSPARSE_UMFPACK_H)
>   #include <ufsparse/umfpack.h>
> [snip]

Shouldn't the above read "#include <suitesparse/umfpack.h>" intead of
"#include <sparsesuite/umfpack.h>"?

[Sorry, I am really confused by this naming issue.]

-- 
Rafael