Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Re: [Pkg-octave-commit] rev 816 - in trunk/packages/octplot/debian: . patches
* Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com> [2006-12-04 08:25]:
> I think we should upload, in order to get the buildds fixed (which means
> that we should upload to _unstable_). I don't expect this version to be
> part of etch, though.
This is an excerpt of Andreas Barth's post in d-d-a:
==========================================================================
The soft freeze continues
~~~~~~~~~~~~
We have not yet reached a point where we believe there should be a hard
freeze of updates into etch, but we ask your continued support by avoiding
uploads that are likely to introduce regressions or be disruptive to other
packages so close before release. Please do not upload new upstream
releases or start library transitions without discussing with the release
team, and please don't upload changes to unstable that are not meant for
Etch. You can always upload such changes to experimental.
==========================================================================
I think that packages upload now to unstable have a good chance to be in
etch. The question is: are the last changes in SVN meant for etch or not?
--
Rafael
Reply to: