Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] [sloisel@gmail.com: Call for rpm/deb/binary packagers for Workshop]
* folajimi <folajimi@speakeasy.net> [2006-03-01 05:46]:
> There are two issues I need clarification on:
>
> 1. Will the 'alien' archiving utility be appropriate for creating the
> desired Octave-related binaries? If I recall correctly, can convert
> between several package management approaches, including Redhat's rpm,
> Slackware's tgz, and (now-defunct?) Stampede's slp.
The alien utility could be an interesting possibility for Sebastien, but I
think the DOG should package the Octave Workshop officially for Debian.
Unfortunately, I have no free time to undertake this task right now.
> 2. What does M-F-T mean?
The Mail-Followup-To header, which I set to pkg-octave-devel@l.a.d.o and
you did not respect, since you cross-posted to octave-maintainers.
Please, either fix your MUA (mail user agent), which is not honoring the
M-F-T header, or be careful to send followups only to the pkg-octave-devel
mailing list, eventually Cc:ing to Sebastien.
--
Rafael
Reply to: