[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#349888: marked as done (octave-gpc: missing libgpcl-dev)



Your message dated Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:46:29 +0100
with message-id <20060125214629.GB7089@laboiss2>
and subject line Bug#349888: octave-gpc: missing libgpcl-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2006 19:48:09 +0000
>From robdebian@gmail.com Wed Jan 25 11:48:09 2006
Return-path: <robdebian@gmail.com>
Received: from 85-18-136-103.fastres.net ([85.18.136.103] helo=sixtyfour)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1F1qcj-0001fZ-MO
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:48:09 -0800
Received: by sixtyfour (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id CAF428E62C; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:47:38 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roberto Pariset <robdebian@gmail.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: octave-gpc: missing libgpcl-dev
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20060125194738.17742.29636.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:47:38 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: octave-gpc
Version: 0.1.5-5
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source

Hi,
on amd64 it FTBFS as you can see on [1]. The reason is:
E: Couldn't find package libgpcl-dev

The bug is probably related to #334230 but I can't be sure as libgpcl-dev
is not apt-gettable now. 


Thanks,
Roberto


[1] 
http://amd64.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=amd64&pkg=octave-gpc&ver=0.1.5-5


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8@euro, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8@euro (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to it_IT.UTF-8@euro)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 349888-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2006 21:46:32 +0000
>From laboissiere@cbs.mpg.de Wed Jan 25 13:46:32 2006
Return-path: <laboissiere@cbs.mpg.de>
Received: from kom.mpisoc.mpg.de ([192.129.1.23] helo=kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1F1sTH-0000YM-PW
	for 349888-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:46:31 -0800
Received: from amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de ([10.1.1.2])
	by kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.50)
	id 1F1sTG-0002E0-Tv; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:46:30 +0100
Received: from [10.80.1.253] (helo=laboiss2)
	by amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 1F1sTH-0003Rt-00; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:46:31 +0100
Received: from rafael by laboiss2 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1F1sTF-0002BK-00; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:46:29 +0100
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:46:29 +0100
From: Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org>
To: Roberto Pariset <robdebian@gmail.com>, 349888-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#349888: octave-gpc: missing libgpcl-dev
Message-ID: <20060125214629.GB7089@laboiss2>
References: <[🔎] 20060125194738.17742.29636.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 20060125205804.GA7089@laboiss2> <[🔎] 43D7EA5F.3060702@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 43D7EA5F.3060702@gmail.com>
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

* Roberto Pariset <robdebian@gmail.com> [2006-01-25 22:15]:

> I can't even compile libgpcl-dev, so I can't say if amd64 is affected
> by #334230 as well.

Why can't you compile the gpcl package on amd64?  Could you please send
the build log to us?

> This said, I think the "bug" can be closed. And again, sorry for my
> mistake.

This message is doing it.  Thanks for your report, anyway.

-- 
Rafael



Reply to: