[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#307188: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#307188: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m["vertices"]'



On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:54:43PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> [Cc: to debian-release]

> * Andreas Jochens <aj@andaco.de> [2005-05-01 15:16]:

> > Package: octave-gpc
> > Version: 0.1.4-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: sarge
> > 
> > When building 'octave-gpc' on i386/testing,
> > I get the following error:
> > 
> > /usr/bin/mkoctfile -v -s -c gpc_create.cc
> > /usr/bin/g++ -c -fPIC -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69 -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69/octave -O2 gpc_create.cc -o gpc_create.o
> > gpc_create.cc: In function `octave_value_list Fgpc_create(const 
> >    octave_value_list&, int)':
> > gpc_create.cc:81: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m["vertices"]'
> > gpc_create.cc:84: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m["indices"]'
> > gpc_create.cc:86: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m["hole"]'
> > make[1]: *** [gpc_create.o] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/octave-gpc-0.1.4'
> > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

> > The newer version 0.1.5-4 in sid builds fine.

> Well, it is not octave-gpc's fault if its newest version is not in sarge
> yet.  According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=octave-gpc,
> we have:

>     # trying to update octave-gpc from 0.1.4-1 to 0.1.5-4 (candidate is 60 
>       days old)
>     # octave-gpc is waiting for gpcl
>       * gpcl is not yet built on alpha: 2.31-5 vs 2.32-1 (missing 2 binaries: libgpcl-dev, libgpcl0)
>       [...]

> gpcl is in non-free and octave-gpc is in contrib.  How could this problem
> be fixed?

By getting gpcl updated on all architectures, requesting manual builds from
the porter lists.

I'm starting a build for alpha here.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: