* Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> [2005-04-15 16:14]: > 1) Do everybody agree with putting the material under the OpenContent > Licence? I checked gnu.org: OPL is considered as a non-free license. However the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 2.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode) qualifies as free. Should we use the CCPL? -- Rafael