Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] octave2.1_2.1.65-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Paul Kienzle <pkienzle@users.sf.net>]

I tested octave-forge against 2.1.64 and octave seg-faulted on the
following:

	C = {[1], [2 3 4]; [5; 9], [6 7 8; 10 11 12]};
	D = C; D(:,:,2) = C;
	cell2mat(D)

If you can confirm that this behaviour does not occur on octave 2.1.65
I will do a new release.

- Paul

On Feb 23, 2005, at 7:51 AM, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:

> * Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> [2005-02-23 10:44]:
>
> > * Isaac Clerencia <isaac@debian.org> [2005-02-23 10:32]:
> >
> > > Package octave-forge is uninstallable in sid just now, because it 
> > > depends on:
> > > Depends: octave2.1 (>= 2.1.64), octave2.1 (<< 2.1.65)
> > >
> > > We should upload a new octave-forge ASAP.
> >
> > I would postpone the actual upload until the build daemons are done 
> > (see my
> > last posts here).  On the other hand, to avoid further delays, we 
> > must start
> > changing the octave-forge debian files in SVN according to the 
> > Guidelines
> > ASAP.  Notice that this is more than a mere rebuild.
> >
> > Volunteers?
>
> By popular demand, I changed my mind and will upload a new octave-forge
> package RSN.
>
> --
> Rafael
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-octave-devel mailing list
> Pkg-octave-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-octave-devel