Bug#1000573: marked as done (Bytecode architectures blocking bug)

["Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>]

Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2021 07:57:09 +0100
with message-id <f14b593552c2fd24dac1d17f154ba958e610c138.camel@gmail.com>
and subject line Upstream uninterested
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000573,
regarding Bytecode architectures blocking bug
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1000573: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000573
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- Begin Message ---

• To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
• Subject: Bytecode architectures blocking bug
• From: Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@gmail.com>
• Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:15:52 +0100
• Message-id: <CAB=MRcJLZ9XvB0Wi70fsNToBHqs2+bN-m3y7_cXdDGkE1tSkcw@mail.gmail.com>

Package: coq

Version: 8.14.0+dfsg-6

Severity: grave

X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org

Don't migrate to testing until the bytecode architectures' situation is cleared.

Cheers, 

J. Puydt

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

• To: 1000573-done@bugs.debian.org
• Subject: Upstream uninterested
• From: Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@gmail.com>
• Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 07:57:09 +0100
• Message-id: <f14b593552c2fd24dac1d17f154ba958e610c138.camel@gmail.com>

Hi,

after some discussion with upstream, they're not ready to support those
architectures, so we can just drop them.

Closing this report so that doesn't hamper migration to testing.

Cheers,

J.Puydt

--- End Message ---