Your message dated Sun, 28 Nov 2021 22:32:13 +0000 with message-id <[🔎] E1mrSiT-0001VN-Sw@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#1000569: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #574717, regarding mingw32-ocaml: Supported arches to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 574717: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574717 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: mingw32-ocaml: Supported arches
- From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:21:53 +0100
- Message-id: <20100320132153.GA13082@roeckx.be>
Package: mingw32-ocaml Version: 3.11.2+debian4 Hi, It seems you currently restrict the arch list to: i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 Is there a reason for this? Both mingw32 and ocaml seem to be supported on all arches (except for mingw32 on hurd-i386). I also don't get why you need to build-depend on gcc-multilib. You have this in your rules file: # Note that we must build a 32 bit compiler, even on 64 bit build # architectures, because this compiler will try to do strength # reduction optimizations using its internal int type, and that must # match Windows' int type. (That's what -cc and -host are for). But the size of an int doesn't change for 32 and 64 targets. Only the size of a long and a pointer do. The description even says: This compiler runs quickly, generates compact code with moderate memory requirements, and is portable to essentially any 32 or 64 bit Unix platform. I currently see no reason not to set the arch list to any. Kurt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 574717-done@bugs.debian.org,574718-done@bugs.debian.org,604419-done@bugs.debian.org,865883-done@bugs.debian.org,878415-done@bugs.debian.org,882602-done@bugs.debian.org,924764-done@bugs.debian.org,924816-done@bugs.debian.org,
- Cc: mingw-ocaml@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1000569: Removed package(s) from unstable
- From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 22:32:13 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] E1mrSiT-0001VN-Sw@fasolo.debian.org>
Version: 4.01.0~20140328-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package mingw-ocaml has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1000569 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---