[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#971415: transition: ocaml



Hi

On 2020-10-16 14:16:47 -0500, Brett Gilio wrote:
> Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> writes:
> 
> > autopkgtest for cudf/0.9-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass
> > autopkgtest for dose3/5.0.1-15: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Test in progress, i386: Pass
> > autopkgtest for mcl/1:14-137+ds-9: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass
> > autopkgtest for morbig/0.10.4-4: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Not a regression
> > autopkgtest for morsmall/0.3.0-3: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass
> > autopkgtest for ocaml-visitors/20200210-2: armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻)
> > autopkgtest for ppx-deriving-yojson/3.5.3-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass
> > autopkgtest for sks/1.1.6+git20200620.9e9d504-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass
> > autopkgtest for why3/1.3.3-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Test in progress, i386: Pass
> >
> 
> Hi, new OCaml team member. Are these regressions introduced on the
> 4.11.x switch? Thanks!

Except for sks, they were fixed by rerunning them with the correct
binNMUs. sks, however, looks like a real issue introduced by the switch
to 4.11.1

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: