[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#949365: marked as done (src:eliom: Build-Depends on NBS package liblwt-ssl-ocaml-dev)



Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:17:25 +0200
with message-id <a0c12300-3b22-cd8b-2d91-7b6ab31b7381@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: RM: liblwt-ssl-ocaml-dev -- NBS; no longer built
has caused the Debian Bug report #949365,
regarding src:eliom: Build-Depends on NBS package liblwt-ssl-ocaml-dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
949365: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949365
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:eliom
Version: 4.2-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

This package Build-Depends on liblwt-ssl-ocaml-dev which is
Not Built from Source anymore since src:lwt version 4.3.0-1.
Please remove the dependency if possible.

Thanks,

--
Juhani

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Stéphane Glondu kirjoitti 20.1.2020 klo 13.56:
> Le 20/01/2020 à 09:49, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>>> I'm not with the FTP Masters but maybe I can still help :)
>>>
>>> There are still packages that build-depend on liblwt-ssl-ocaml-dev, and
>>> additionally src:lwt still suggests it. The Build-Deps are probably
>>> preventing automatic cruft removal of liblwt-ssl-ocaml-dev and
>>> src:lwt/2.7.1-7 from unstable. I'll file bugs.
>>
>> liblwt-ssl-ocaml* packages will be provided by a new source package that
>> I'm planning to package.
> 
> See #949371. In NEW queue. This RM request is obsolete, I guess. Closing.

Thanks for explaining. No need for those reminder bugs on lwt-ssl users
in that case then; closing them as well.


Juhani

--- End Message ---

Reply to: