[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#919953: /usrr/bin/dune and `dune' binary package should refer to dune-common



Package: dune
Version: 1.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Control: block -1 by 919951

According to Debian policy file conflicts should be resolved by no-one
using the conflicting name.  This applies to /usr/bin/dune.

Additionally, the only referent of `dune' that anyone has heard of
(eg, wikipedia) is a C++ library which we have in Debian as
`src:dune-commmon', `libdune*-dev', etc.

It is evident from actions taken in response to #916468 that the you
(the maintainers of what is current `src:dune') do not agree.

Instead, it seems to me that you ahead and took the name despite a
fairly clear consensus in debian-devel that you shouldn't.  I don't
think you should have done that.

I am escalating this to the Technical Commitee in another bug.  In the
meantime this bug needs to be open to keep this out of testing.

Sorry,
Ian.

-- 
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.


Reply to: