Re: dune_1.0~beta20-1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org>]

On 18/04/2018 09:53, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > > binary:dune is NEW.
> > > binary:dune is NEW.
> > > source:dune is NEW.
> > >
> > > Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
> > > from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
> > > OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
> > >
> > > Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
> > > free to browse the NEW queue[1].
> > >
> > > If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
> > > member of the ftpteam.
> > >
> > > If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.
> > >
> > > [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> > >        or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports
> >
> > I didn't see any ITP for this package...
>
> Upstream is currently in the process of renaming jbuilder to dune, so it
> seems a good idea to follow this move. At the very least the renaming of
> the binary package.

I know and I agree. This doesn't contradict my initial sentence: I 
didn't see any ITP for this package.

Cheers,

--
Stéphane