Re: Bug#871469: transition: ocaml
On 23/09/17 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 14/09/17 15:44, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> Stéphane Glondu:
>>> On 15/08/2017 22:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>>> [...]
>>>>> ocaml 4.05.0 and a few selected packages have been uploaded to
>>>>> experimental and build fine on all architectures [3].
>>>>
>>>>> So, basically, this transition is ready to be started from my point of
>>>>> view.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will take care of the necessary binNMUs.
>>>>
>>>> Go ahead.
>>>
>>> The transition in Fedora revealed an issue with native dynlink on arm64
>>> [1]. The issue is being sorted out upstream [2]. Let's wait a bit. If
>>> this is not fixed in one week, we'll upload ocaml with native dynlink
>>> disabled on arm64.
>>>
>>> [1] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6906
>>> [2] https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/1268
>>>
>> Upstream fixed this "properly" so I've included that patch and done a new upload to experimental. Everything seems OK so far, just waiting for slower architectures to build.
>>
>> Soon, I will upload to unstable and begin the transition. Let me know if you need me to delay it further.
>
> That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is someone
> from the ocaml team handling these, or should I?
This took forever, but it finally migrated:
ocaml | 4.05.0-10 | testing | source, amd64, arm64, armel,
armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
I had to remove approx and its only rdep openstack-meta-packages, which were
scheduled for autoremoval anyway.
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: