[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RFS: ocaml-migrate-parsetree



  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ocaml-migrate-parsetree"

 * Package name    : ocaml-migrate-parsetree
   Version         : 1.0.6-1
   Upstream Author : Frédéric Bour <frederic.bour@lakaban.net> and
Jérémie Dimino <jeremie@dimino.org>
 * URL             : https://github.com/ocaml-ppx/ocaml-migrate-parsetree
 * License         : LGPL2.1 with linking exception
   Section         : ocaml

  It builds those binary packages:

    libmigrate-parsetree-ocaml - Convert OCaml parsetrees between
different major versions (Runtim
 libmigrate-parsetree-ocaml-dev - Convert OCaml parsetrees between
different major versions (Develo
 libmigrate-parsetree-ocamlbuild-ocaml - Convert OCaml parsetrees
between different major versions (Runtim
 libmigrate-parsetree-ocamlbuild-ocaml-dev - Convert OCaml parsetrees
between different major versions (Develo

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/ocaml-migrate-parsetree


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ocaml-migrate-parsetree/ocaml-migrate-parsetree_1.0.6-1.dsc



This is a dependency of ocaml-sedlex 1.99.4 (ITP Bug#867238).

There are a number of things that I'm not sure:

 * When I try to use dh_ocamldoc, there is an error processing
migrate_parsetree_versions.mli, which contains OCaml_OCAML_VERSION,
which should be replaced by a preprocessor in some way. I want to
exclude it from ocamldoc, but turn out the dh_ocamldoc "-X" option
wouldn't work. So, I copied the whole ocamldoc command into
override_dh_ocamldoc.

 * The license should be LGPL2.1 with linking exception - I'm not sure
if I describe it correctly in d/copyright.

 * There is an ocamlbuild plugin package built from this source
package, I'm not sure the naming,
libmigrate-parsetree-ocamlbuild-ocaml, is correct or not.

Please review and advise.

Best regards,
Andy


Reply to: