Re: Bug#871469: transition: ocaml
- To: Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org>, 871469@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, Debian Ocaml Maint ML <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#871469: transition: ocaml
- From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:03:53 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20171006090353.q365ej2ebs3n6afd@perpetual.pseudorandom.co.uk>
- In-reply-to: <ec1fb2ec-fae7-8920-4850-f0fdf294aee5@debian.org>
- References: <150218114569.29466.1073103413643257794.reportbug@korell.up7.fr> <588ae2c5-d30e-80df-3a02-2c46580ea35b@debian.org> <bab3aeaa-4163-b675-90b2-f8a57a3d293f@debian.org> <150218114569.29466.1073103413643257794.reportbug@korell.up7.fr> <545ca11b-0971-db13-8a25-c2dc6ffb7866@debian.org> <9b52091c-2cf9-33c9-70f9-a2022f06e289@debian.org> <150218114569.29466.1073103413643257794.reportbug@korell.up7.fr> <ec1fb2ec-fae7-8920-4850-f0fdf294aee5@debian.org>
Control: block 871469 by 877548
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 at 10:05:02 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> On 23/09/2017 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is someone
> > from the ocaml team handling these, or should I?
>
> I am handling these.
Hi,
Would it be possible to prioritize the rebuilds of lwt and ocaml-ctypes?
They seem to be in the critical path to make llvm-toolchain-5.0 buildable
again, which is breaking cross-architecture installability of Mesa, a
relatively common configuration for i386 packages on amd64.
Unfortunately lwt currently fails to build from source (#877548). I notice
that the test rebuild at <http://ocaml.debian.net/debian/ocaml-4.05.0%2Brc1/>
has a newer upstream release of lwt which hopefully addresses that?
Thanks,
smcv
Reply to: