[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#834071: marked as done (libfieldslib-ocaml{, -dev}: fails to upgrade from 'sid' - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/fieldslib/{META, field.annot})

Your message dated Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:19:47 +0000
with message-id <E1bZzox-0002x1-Af@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#834071: fixed in fieldslib 113.33.03-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #834071,
regarding libfieldslib-ocaml{, -dev}: fails to upgrade from 'sid' - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/fieldslib/{META, field.annot}
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
834071: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834071
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libfieldslib-ocaml,libfieldslib-ocaml-dev
Version: 113.33.03-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Selecting previously unselected package libfieldslib-ocaml.
  Preparing to unpack .../libfieldslib-ocaml_113.33.03-1_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking libfieldslib-ocaml (113.33.03-1) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libfieldslib-ocaml_113.33.03-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/ocaml/fieldslib/META', which is also in package libfields-camlp4-dev 113.00.00-1
  Selecting previously unselected package libfieldslib-ocaml-dev.
  Preparing to unpack .../libfieldslib-ocaml-dev_113.33.03-1_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking libfieldslib-ocaml-dev (113.33.03-1) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libfieldslib-ocaml-dev_113.33.03-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/ocaml/fieldslib/field.annot', which is also in package libfields-camlp4-dev 113.00.00-1
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/libfieldslib-ocaml_113.33.03-1_amd64.deb
   /var/cache/apt/archives/libfieldslib-ocaml-dev_113.33.03-1_amd64.deb


cheers,

Andreas

Attachment: libfields-camlp4-dev=113.00.00-1_libfieldslib-ocaml-dev=113.33.03-1.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: fieldslib
Source-Version: 113.33.03-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
fieldslib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 834071@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org> (supplier of updated fieldslib package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:07:26 +0200
Source: fieldslib
Binary: libfieldslib-ocaml-dev libfieldslib-ocaml
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 113.33.03-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org>
Description:
 libfieldslib-ocaml - OCaml syntax extension that enables folding over record fields (r
 libfieldslib-ocaml-dev - OCaml syntax extension that enables folding over record fields (d
Closes: 834071
Changes:
 fieldslib (113.33.03-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Upload to unstable
   * Add Breaks/Replaces libfields-camlp4-dev (Closes: #834071)
   * Move ocaml-findlib to Recommends
   * Fix FTBFS on bytecode architectures
Checksums-Sha1:
 d322301b5b450fc24eeba2ce747afd505c6d646b 2246 fieldslib_113.33.03-2.dsc
 154230556a980237e57d8d394a3204cc70958d86 2900 fieldslib_113.33.03-2.debian.tar.xz
 aef11bac8d993454c857cf75f677949786b20f7d 2706 libfieldslib-ocaml-dbgsym_113.33.03-2_amd64.deb
 f3331a352d43e8a02611bdb94d67a551b43f2643 14526 libfieldslib-ocaml-dev_113.33.03-2_amd64.deb
 09651164a3177e044c171e2b65774f0650988f78 8476 libfieldslib-ocaml_113.33.03-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 29fa857919c86e9d00952fed130a6ede39db47206e677c04f669ac7e7b9964f9 2246 fieldslib_113.33.03-2.dsc
 ba958d74a44483854503ac3d97d4ad2a9eac7418efdc552154300a1a9d0eb88f 2900 fieldslib_113.33.03-2.debian.tar.xz
 6ebe6feec89b0e9956900efc8fec8aa4c342036588fa5c9a8ff2543bd56d19d5 2706 libfieldslib-ocaml-dbgsym_113.33.03-2_amd64.deb
 649eecaa3bb08355283e96b321ce9c32422022d7d7bf3013d7afe8ea94d15122 14526 libfieldslib-ocaml-dev_113.33.03-2_amd64.deb
 c33e2ba702d66e28173cc974c2601e11e2a3580c79c9176c9a08057075a329fc 8476 libfieldslib-ocaml_113.33.03-2_amd64.deb
Files:
 48cb0adfe0e52a4b94b48ef74d035e65 2246 ocaml extra fieldslib_113.33.03-2.dsc
 b3582f6f01ca259a8ff6d86371476904 2900 ocaml extra fieldslib_113.33.03-2.debian.tar.xz
 dcb124a57fadf1d503d76f5930fcbe19 2706 debug extra libfieldslib-ocaml-dbgsym_113.33.03-2_amd64.deb
 90f0840d30bf6055c3fc99d57ca94679 14526 ocaml extra libfieldslib-ocaml-dev_113.33.03-2_amd64.deb
 dffd87a609d6cbf46eab361c54cfbe29 8476 ocaml extra libfieldslib-ocaml_113.33.03-2_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXtFT9AAoJEHhT2k1JiBrTHScQAK6LAi1YkUwU16Grm81CSAn8
q9zxUjILnSIqTJfBHXoYtDKca3PIvS1eTdWvCQS3sEXRQjncNJHnuLUrSTevzvu0
53jtfHVVwzd5t9YMa37CzYKDsZiSc10mCxvVkxhOWgwe1az1xb2ta3foxSuQTf21
lXM/vEEtNqhNF0zC3cYQOv8bobP1qPQjXdfhsK6NbqIDVTUobcYz8eCJkikc++Yt
p7K2phTCG2oUwzf1lPlvum7kZ2Gg14iBD2DVPLzj7aR4TMYIMPv2db4G4wiS3l3M
KbJsC6qgHsPDdiaAcbvSdt1Ak6F7m/zjknjZ29CG1G5OvltCXrUvvnKYmW9rQtaf
UBHLYRCzasa/wtxlN9Mta3nwYm16jnRgMMKKMaYLVG/dtfuOPVvpHqtLTIj8Ecie
PEdjUEgJCyAVwVj66/sog1wVnBKSpXxEbEDB4SVnKqgxpFLYqbGkwnpm6prPSUXx
hPdAnQoWTpJqcoFj3YbeLpGGnXADhP00Whk6xAAWZ8/51Soh4VQyrDZfXL9EjOPu
w/gA0u+WdXmuEc0rzZBphsujOkdaKlDo0lP0OYeT9QxJlm31WkpUEO7dEd4tZZSa
tx59DL46RAtTT35eVdPlU74KB66u9eM9GXeDOYkIkoSGNtZ9eav/H0pjfZlNJAb2
aeskL6pI/60xdB++gTW9
=llTT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: