[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#718317: marked as done (apt-cudf: doesn't include any source preference in the Request stanza)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:29:16 +0100
with message-id <20160129072916.GB7144@seneca.home.org>
and subject line Re: apt-cudf: doesn't include any source preference in the Request stanza
has caused the Debian Bug report #718317,
regarding apt-cudf: doesn't include any source preference in the Request stanza
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
718317: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718317
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apt-cudf
Version: 3.0.2-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

When apt-get is run with custom --solver, e.g. like this:

$ apt-get --solver custom_solver install xfce4-panel/testing   ,

the resulting CUDF scenario starts with the following request stanza:

Request: EDSP 0.4
Install: xfce4-panel:i386
Strict-Pinning: no

This is the whole of it, and there is no mention of the fact,
that the user explicitly requested installation from Suite=testing.

Also, why doesn't apt's EDSP specify a Preamble stanza with
Suite defined as suggested here: http://mancoosi.org/cudf/primer/ ?

Should this issue really be reassigned to apt?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing')

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Closing this bug now, as the issue with supposedly missing Preferences has
been explained in the mail by Zack.

-Ralf.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: