[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#720696: Bug #720696: confluence: FTBFS with make 3.82 from experimental: ocamlc.opt: Command not found



Control: close -1

Hi,

This bug seems to have been fixed a long time ago,
given that we now have Make 4.1, and I can confirm
that the package builds perfectly fine.


Best,

  nicoo

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 08:47:02AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> 
> From my pbuilder build log, using a chroot image with make 3.82-1 from
> experimental installed:
> 
> ...
> cd src && /usr/bin/make PREFIX=/tmp/buildd/confluence-0.10.6/debian/confluence/usr
> make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/confluence-0.10.6/src'
> Makefile:147: depend: No such file or directory
> cd cfeval && ocamlyacc -v cfParser.mly
> cd cfeval && ocamllex cfLexer.mll
> 420 states, 7979 transitions, table size 34436 bytes
> cd fnflib && ocamlyacc -v psl_parser.mly
> cd fnflib && ocamllex psl_lexer.mll
> 313 states, 21560 transitions, table size 88118 bytes
> cd fnflib && ocamlyacc -v fnf_parser.mly
> cd fnflib && ocamllex fnf_lexer.mll
> 83 states, 321 transitions, table size 1782 bytes
> ocamldep -I misc -I cfeval -I fnflib \
>     misc/*.ml      misc/*.mli   \
>     cfeval/*.ml    cfeval/*.mli \
>     fnflib/*.ml    fnflib/*.mli \
>     > depend
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/confluence-0.10.6/src'
> make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/confluence-0.10.6/src'
> ocamlc.opt -I misc -I cfeval -I fnflib     -c misc/ut.mli
> /bin/bash: ocamlc.opt: command not found
> make[2]: *** [misc/ut.cmi] Error 127
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/confluence-0.10.6/src'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/confluence-0.10.6'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
> 
> If I pbuilder login into the same chroot image, install a build of make
> 3.81-8.2, and retry the build, then it succeeds.
> -- 
> Daniel Schepler
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: