Bug#797100: marked as done (misleading directions in example ocaml.ben)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Oct 2015 09:49:19 +0000
with message-id <E1Znkad-0000Mx-Hg@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#797100: fixed in ben 0.7.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #797100,
regarding misleading directions in example ocaml.ben
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
797100: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797100
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: ben: Uncaught exception: ben-specific error: No configuration file has been specified
- From: Gilles Filippini <pini@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:35:31 +0000
- Message-id: <20150827193531.19056.99696.reportbug@pinislim.bou-fi.net>
Package: ben
Version: 0.7.2
Severity: important
Hi,
'ben monitor' complains about missing configuration file when trying
a any of the valid examples. For instance:
(sid)pini@pinislim:~/tmp$ mkdir work
(sid)pini@pinislim:~/tmp$ cd work
(sid)pini@pinislim:~/tmp/work$ ben download
Downloading Sources...
Downloading Packages_kfreebsd-i386...Downloading Packages_amd64...
Downloading Packages_mips...
Downloading Packages_armel...
Downloading Packages_mipsel...
Downloading Packages_armhf...
Downloading Packages_powerpc...
Downloading Packages_arm64...
Downloading Packages_ppc64el...
Downloading Packages_i386...
Downloading Packages_s390x...
Downloading Packages_kfreebsd-amd64...
(sid)pini@pinislim:~/tmp/work$ ben monitor -c /usr/share/doc/ben/examples/monitor/ocaml.ben
Uncaught exception: ben-specific error: No configuration file has been specified
Did I miss something?
Thanks in advance,
_g.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: unable to detect
Versions of packages ben depends on:
ii bzip2 1.0.6-8
ii curl 7.44.0-1
ii libben-ocaml [libben-ocaml-7yll1] 0.7.2
ii libc6 2.19-19
ii libjs-jquery 1.11.3+dfsg-2
ii libpcre3 2:8.35-7.1
ii libpq5 9.4.4-1
ii libtyxml-ocaml [libtyxml-ocaml-lt849] 3.0.0-1
ii ocaml-base-nox [ocaml-base-nox-4.01.0] 4.01.0-5
Versions of packages ben recommends:
pn dose-distcheck <none>
ben suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ben
Source-Version: 0.7.2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ben, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 797100@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@debian.org> (supplier of updated ben package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 09:33:05 +0200
Source: ben
Binary: libben-ocaml-dev libben-ocaml ben
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.7.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@debian.org>
Description:
ben - toolbox for Debian maintainers
libben-ocaml - OCaml libraries for Debian maintainers (runtime package)
libben-ocaml-dev - OCaml libraries for Debian maintainers (development package)
Closes: 797100 800390
Changes:
ben (0.7.2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Use date from last changelog entry in generated documentation to ensure
a reproducible build.
* Use http://httpredir.debian.org/debian as a default Debian mirror.
* Update instructions in example file (Closes: #797100).
* Set section to "devel" (Closes: #800390).
* Drop Benl_arg module and use OCaml's Arg module. This change bumps
minimal required version for OCaml to 4.01.
Checksums-Sha1:
6af954ec4f557fecc224fc953cc6bc237b7dce44 2100 ben_0.7.2.dsc
39f65e649b946c0c7e4dba458562222ef22f4449 60816 ben_0.7.2.tar.xz
4fe186ed620a478c8386c3e8845eab0bcf950c04 1057494 ben_0.7.2_amd64.deb
0725fd79e12501d3411f4c2c9f6199a98098d790 249070 libben-ocaml-dev_0.7.2_amd64.deb
11e301e642bca2efe7109091eb3980b81fcbfbc9 124660 libben-ocaml_0.7.2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
ffc5a81f5fceba52b1d1cc66b35a6951241f18e833bf681e131c0feadc4e2e47 2100 ben_0.7.2.dsc
88841c9e67106b33d4a22fa086527f45312b5ee0b5a36db67bc0f40ad957c79b 60816 ben_0.7.2.tar.xz
b3effe5cb57d5168fffd12abfceeb1a4fe1b9d79a8a9e2162b6ecfe409448c53 1057494 ben_0.7.2_amd64.deb
88d6494e783aacf6b4463377604d82b75bd61496641b23be529899cd224f4362 249070 libben-ocaml-dev_0.7.2_amd64.deb
3bf8fec222bdecdf869470ae7987221f79860d0f80466b2f261cf17b4236924c 124660 libben-ocaml_0.7.2_amd64.deb
Files:
24e8cc06ac707e34ab1f3f6efd01e6a1 2100 devel optional ben_0.7.2.dsc
0ee6c5a47ac380560e12570d0cb91fbf 60816 devel optional ben_0.7.2.tar.xz
e3f4e39ba7f6e7931981c800151bbf44 1057494 devel optional ben_0.7.2_amd64.deb
cf0731bea7ceb15735bdc1d3ee9f3dd5 249070 devel optional libben-ocaml-dev_0.7.2_amd64.deb
7fb9f87b93c203e492226122f940f3f7 124660 devel optional libben-ocaml_0.7.2_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=ouTF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: