Bug#291383: marked as done (Buffer.add: cannot grow buffer)
Your message dated Sat, 18 Oct 2014 15:22:20 +0200
with message-id <20141018132219.GB26811@free.fr>
and subject line SpamOracle - wontfix
has caused the Debian Bug report #291383,
regarding Buffer.add: cannot grow buffer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
291383: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291383
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Buffer.add: cannot grow buffer
- From: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <samu@mclink.it>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:48:45 +0100
- Message-id: <20050120124845.B591892990@cthugha.linuxasylum.net>
Package: spamoracle
Version: 1.4-3
Severity: normal
while using spamoracle with procmail after a long
time using it (more than 1 year) it started to
give me these errors on procmail log :
>From kim101qqw@netian.com Thu Jan 20 09:02:03 2005
Subject: ***SPAM***
=?iso-8859-1?Q?=B1=A4=B0=ED=29=B8=B6=C4=C9=C6=C3_=B0=ED=B9
Folder: spambox
9237
Fatal error: exception Failure("Buffer.add: cannot grow buffer")
procmail: Error while writing to "/usr/bin/spamoracle"
procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data succeeded
procmail: Error while writing to "/home/tonon/mail/inbox"
procmail: Truncated file to former size
procmail: Error while writing to "/var/mail/tonon"
procmail: Truncated file to former size
looking on to the web it came out that :
http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200301/msg00041.html
however my .spamoracle.db seems not so big; it's 3201724 bytes
and it's invoked in procmailrc as:
####
PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/bin:/dev/null:.
MAILDIR=$HOME/mail/
DEFAULT=$HOME/mail/inbox
LOGFILE=$HOME/mail/Log.procmail
LOCKFILE=$HOME/.maillock
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamoracle mark
:0
* ^X-Spam: yes;
spambox
:0
* ^X-Spam-Flag: YES
spambox
###
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=it_IT@euro, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages spamoracle depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 171409 + wontfix
tags 341704 + wontfix
stop
Spamoracle no longer actively developed since 2003 (according to its
maintainer). The only change is accepted: corrections security breaches or
corruptions of the database.
On Sun, 06 Apr 2014 11:41:38 +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> De manière générale, SpamOracle n'est plus développé depuis longtemps
> (dernière release en 2003) et tout juste maintenu. S'il y avait un
> gros problème (trou de sécurité, corruption de la base de données),
> les deux autres mainteneurs (*) et moi ferions un correctif et une
> release. Mais ce n'est pas le cas ici.
> Par ailleurs, nous "upstream" n'avons jamais testé SpamOracle avec
> autre chose que procmail. Si ça marche avec qmail ou autre, tant
> mieux pour l'utilisateur, mais "upstream" ne s'engage pas là dessus.
>
> (*) Voir https://forge.ocamlcore.org/projects/spamoracle/
--
Stéphane Aulery
--- End Message ---
Reply to: