[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#751693: libjs-of-ocaml-dev: Broken dependencies render unrelated packages FTBFS



Package: libjs-of-ocaml-dev
Version: 1.4-1
Severity: serious
Usertags: goto-cc
Affects: eliom

During a rebuild of all Debian packages in a clean sid chroot (using cowbuilder
and pbuilder) the build of eliom 3.0.3-5 failed with the following error.

[...]
 -> Attempting to parse the build-deps 
 -> Considering build-dep ocaml-nox (>= 4.01)
   -> Trying ocaml-nox
 -> Considering build-dep ocaml-findlib (>= 1.4.1)
   -> Trying ocaml-findlib
 -> Considering build-dep dh-ocaml (>= 0.9~)
   -> Trying dh-ocaml
 -> Considering build-dep debhelper (>= 8)
   -> Trying debhelper
 -> Considering build-dep ocsigenserver (>= 2.0.4)
   -> Trying ocsigenserver
 -> Considering build-dep libocsigenserver-ocaml-dev (>= 2.2)
   -> Trying libocsigenserver-ocaml-dev
 -> Considering build-dep libderiving-ocsigen-ocaml-dev (>= 0.3)
   -> Trying libderiving-ocsigen-ocaml-dev
 -> Considering build-dep libjs-of-ocaml-dev (>= 1.3.2)
   -> Trying libjs-of-ocaml-dev
       -> Cannot install libjs-of-ocaml-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libjs-of-ocaml-dev : Depends: libderiving-ocsigen-ocaml-dev-s0zm7 but it is not installable
                      Depends: libjs-of-ocaml-rn5e6
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


It seems that those depended-on packages don't even exist anymore. Maybe a
BinNMU is all that is needed, but I'm quite surprised how these dependencies
ever came about.

Best,
Michael

Attachment: pgpgPtIgBVLLO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: