Bug#642706: bin-prot: FTBFS: Command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild syntax/pa_bin_prot.cma syntax/pa_bin_prot.cmxa syntax/pa_bin_prot.a lib/libbin_prot.a lib/dllbin_prot.so lib/bin_prot.cma lib/bin_prot.cmxa lib/bin_prot.a lib_test/test_runner.native -tag debug' terminated with error code 10

[Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>]

Hi,

Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:

> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
[...]
>> + ocamlfind ocamldep -pp 'cpp -DARCH_SIXTYFOUR' -package unix -package bigarray -modules lib/unsafe_read_c.mli > lib/unsafe_read_c.mli.depends
>> Command exited with code 2.
>> E: Command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild syntax/pa_bin_prot.cma syntax/pa_bin_prot.cmxa syntax/pa_bin_prot.a lib/libbin_prot.a lib/dllbin_prot.so lib/bin_prot.cma lib/bin_prot.cmxa lib/bin_prot.a lib_test/test_runner.native -tag debug' terminated with error code 10

Thanks again for all your work in tracking these down!  I assume
bin-prot/sid and sexplib310 build correctly again against dash
0.5.7-2.

So what should be done with these bugs?  I am tempted to say:

 - lower severity to important, since we have a workaround
 - reassign to current ocaml-nox
 - merge and mark as forwarded to
   http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5371

Does that sound reasonable?

Jonathan
who is looking forward to having a few fewer RC bugs on his radar :)