tyxml_2.0~rc1-1_armel.changes is NEW
libtyxml-ocaml-dev_2.0~rc1-1_armel.deb
to main/t/tyxml/libtyxml-ocaml-dev_2.0~rc1-1_armel.deb
libtyxml-ocaml-doc_2.0~rc1-1_all.deb
to main/t/tyxml/libtyxml-ocaml-doc_2.0~rc1-1_all.deb
(new) libtyxml-ocaml_2.0~rc1-1_armel.deb optional ocaml
typed XML in OCaml (plugins)
TyXML allows one to build XML trees whose validity is ensured by the
typechecker. It's based on a translation of XML types into polymorphic
variants, originally written by Thorsten Ohl. Currently, the
transcription has been done for XHTML 1.0 and 1.1, HTML5 and SVG
(partial).
.
TyXML also provides a generic printer and some low-level (and
untyped) iterators over XML trees. The printer has options for
printing XHTML in more browser-friendly way when served as
"text/html" (instead of "text/xml"). HTML5 is always printed with
those options.
.
All modules provided by TyXML are also provided in functorial
interface, where every module is parameterised by the underlying XML
representation.
.
A camlp4 extension, named Pa_tyxml, allows one to write HTML pages or
HTML fragments with the usual syntax.
.
This package contains dynamically loadable modules for plugins.
tyxml_2.0~rc1-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/t/tyxml/tyxml_2.0~rc1-1.debian.tar.gz
tyxml_2.0~rc1-1.dsc
to main/t/tyxml/tyxml_2.0~rc1-1.dsc
tyxml_2.0~rc1.orig.tar.gz
to main/t/tyxml/tyxml_2.0~rc1.orig.tar.gz
Changes: tyxml (2.0~rc1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
* Create new runtime binary package libtyxml-ocaml
Override entries for your package:
libtyxml-ocaml-dev_2.0~rc1-1_armel.deb - optional ocaml
libtyxml-ocaml-doc_2.0~rc1-1_all.deb - optional doc
tyxml_2.0~rc1-1.dsc - source ocaml
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.
You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above
if files already exist in other distributions.
Reply to: