On Friday, 29. January 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Jan Wagner wrote: > > I stumbled upon the same problem on backporting. From my point of view, > > user of you package don't have the track down the versioned build-dep of > > the packages. > > From my point of view, users should not backport packages. We didn't > release dh_ocaml 0.9 for lenny, I'm pretty sure of that. Who should do backports in your eyes? Debian Developers? Maintainers? Nobody? Anyways ... you should provide correct (build-)dependencies, even if it would be better, if debhelper would provide a way to define such versioned dep for its own. With kind regards, Jan. -- Never write mail to <waja@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned! -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.