Possible problems in your Debian packages
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail
=== advi:
= There are 4 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them.
See http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/source-package/advi
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #550440 <http://bugs.debian.org/550440>
advi: CVE-2009-2295 arbitrary code execution
Appears to affect stable, you should fix it for the next point release
=== camlimages:
= There is 1 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them.
See http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/source-package/camlimages
=== cothreads:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #549784 <http://bugs.debian.org/549784>
cothreads: FTBFS: E: Error: unit Mutex exported in libcothreads-ocaml-dev v0.10-2 but already exported by ocaml-nox/ocaml-base-nox v3.11.1-3
=== jocaml:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #549779 <http://bugs.debian.org/549779>
jocaml: FTBFS: mv: cannot move `/build/user-jocaml_3.11.1-2-amd64-3cSfyQ/jocaml-3.11.1/debian/tmp//usr/lib/jocaml//toploop.cmi' to `/build/user-jocaml_3.11.1-2-amd64-3cSfyQ/jocaml-3.11.1/debian/jocaml//usr/lib/jocaml//jocamltoploop/': No such file or directory
= Missing build(s) on sparc
This might need manual action from your side.
See http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=jocaml
=== json-wheel:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #549766 <http://bugs.debian.org/549766>
json-wheel: FTBFS: debian/rules:5: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ocaml.mk: No such file or directory
=== ledit:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #549718 <http://bugs.debian.org/549718>
ledit: FTBFS: make: /usr/share/ocaml/ocamldoc-api-ref-config: Command not found
=== liquidsoap:
= 2 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #551245 <http://bugs.debian.org/551245>
liquidsoap: FTBFS: pattern matching error
- #541635 <http://bugs.debian.org/541635>
liquidsoap: incorrect dependencies on init script
Part of release goal: dependency-based init system
=== matita:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #532289 <http://bugs.debian.org/532289>
matita fails to build in a non-networking environment.
= Lintian reports 9 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org.html#matita
=== mldonkey:
= There is 1 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them.
See http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/source-package/mldonkey
= Lintian reports 6 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org.html#mldonkey
=== ocaml-gettext:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #551234 <http://bugs.debian.org/551234>
ocaml-gettext: FTBFS: Error: Unbound module FileUtil.StrUtil
=== pgocaml:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #549151 <http://bugs.debian.org/549151>
FTBFS: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ocaml.mk: No such file or directory
=== unison:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #517972 <http://bugs.debian.org/517972>
please document -sshargs command-line option
Part of release goal: IPv6 support
=== xmlrpc-light:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #549723 <http://bugs.debian.org/549723>
xmlrpc-light: FTBFS: debian/rules:25: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ocaml.mk: No such file or directory
= Lintian reports 2 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org.html#xmlrpc-light
=== Packages with a new upstream version according to DEHS:
advi 1.7.2 (Debian: 1.6.0-14)
bibtex2html 1.95 (Debian: 1.94-2)
frama-c beta1 (Debian: 20090901+beryllium+dfsg-1)
janest-core 0.6.0 (Debian: 0.5.3-1)
mlpost current (Debian: 0.7.1-2)
ocaml-batteries 20090903 (Debian: 0.20090405+beta1-3)
ocamlgraph 1.3 (Debian: 1.2+debian-1)
postgresql-ocaml 1.12.3 (Debian: 1.12.1-2)
sexplib310 4.2.16 (Debian: 4.2.11-2)
type-conv 1.6.10 (Debian: 1.6.7-3)
unison 2.32.52 (Debian: 2.27.57-2)
why 2.21 (Debian: 2.19+dfsg-2)
------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------
We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.
If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe <email>
You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received
this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this
won't remove your PTS subscription.
- ignore <package> <email>
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore <bug> <email>
You will no longer receive information about this bug.
All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.
A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you
believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful
information.
--
DDPOMail,
run by Raphael Geissert
Reply to: