retitle 550378 dh-ocaml >= 0.9 packaging practices should be documented in policy
thanks
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 07:39:04PM +0200, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
> The documentation is not consistent with the recent dh_ocaml migration.
> Changing class/ocaml.mk to rules/ocaml.mk in appendix-cdbs.xml would be helpful.
More generally, all the info about ${ocaml:Depends}, ${ocaml:Provides}
should be documented in our packaging policy.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature