[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Q&A for OCaml package: a few ideas



On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:25:50PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote:
> Sorry, I wasn't precise enough. I wanted to say: write a specific
> set of tests *per binary package* that runs the binaries. So it
> could be "-version" or "--version" or whatever depending of the
> package.

Then, IMO, you should go back to step 1 of my answer. Given that you
are going to need per-package work anyhow, it would be better to push
that work upstream, providing per-package patches that do that.

Just my 0.02€

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: