[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Policy, location of .cma files in binary packages, and dynlink...



On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 03:16:37PM +0100, Stephane Glondu wrote:
>> I understand this, but as distribution editors factorizing out common
>> part is what we are usually most concerned about. But I agree that some
>> stats would be nice, any taker? :-)
> Attached are sizes of binary packages libxxx-ocaml{,-dev} (I've just  
> picked a random version of the .deb file on an mirror).

Cool, thanks.

I was planning to crunch your data by myself in order to:

- keep only the lines which are shared by the two files (i.e. packages
  which both have a -dev and a runtime part)
- compute the relative ration of the two parts, because actually this is
  what we were interested in in the beginning

Since after more than a week I still have to do it ... can you please
perhaps give it a try? :)

TIA,
Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org}  -<%>-  http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: