[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Policy, location of .cma files in binary packages, and dynlink...



On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 10:42:10PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> If ocaml dynamic linking is now going to happen, the policy should be
> adapted, and the separation will always be that whatever is needed at
> runtime goes into the * package, and what is needed only at build time,
> should go into the -dev packages.

With the problem that it is no longer sharp clear what goes where, see
my post for the details, but you no longer knows whether at runtime only
a .so is needed or also a bunch of .cma.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org}  -<%>-  http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: