[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention



On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:41:53AM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> > === missinglib:
> I am in favor of dropping this one unless someone is willing to fix it:
> upstream is dead, it is FTBFS and has no reverse (build-)deps. Popcon is
> 44. Does anyone object to this?

I was going to propose the same :), adding to your reasons that we
already have extlib which is similar in purpose, but with a larger user
base and an active upstream.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org}  -<%>-  http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: