[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#450594: marked as done (libcryptokit-ocaml-dev: depends on ocaml with X support)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:02:03 +0000
with message-id <E1J5roZ-0002Yn-0l@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#450594: fixed in cryptokit 1.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libcryptokit-ocaml-dev
Version: 1.3-6
Severity: important


This package depends on "ocaml" package, making it depend on
libx11. It is not installable in an environment where only "ocaml-nox"
is installed. Version 1.3-3 does not have this problem.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libcryptokit-ocaml-dev depends on:
ii  libcryptokit-ocaml            1.3-6      cryptographic algorithm library fo
pn  ocaml-nox-3.09.2              <none>     (no description available)

libcryptokit-ocaml-dev recommends no packages.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: cryptokit
Source-Version: 1.3-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cryptokit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cryptokit_1.3-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cryptokit/cryptokit_1.3-7.diff.gz
cryptokit_1.3-7.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cryptokit/cryptokit_1.3-7.dsc
libcryptokit-ocaml-dev_1.3-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cryptokit/libcryptokit-ocaml-dev_1.3-7_i386.deb
libcryptokit-ocaml_1.3-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cryptokit/libcryptokit-ocaml_1.3-7_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 450594@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Samuel Mimram <smimram@debian.org> (supplier of updated cryptokit package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:49:16 +0100
Source: cryptokit
Binary: libcryptokit-ocaml libcryptokit-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Samuel Mimram <smimram@debian.org>
Description: 
 libcryptokit-ocaml - cryptographic algorithm library for OCaml - runtime
 libcryptokit-ocaml-dev - cryptographic algorithm library for OCaml - development
Closes: 450594
Changes: 
 cryptokit (1.3-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Depend on ocaml-nox instead of ocaml, closes: #450594.
   * Updated stantards version to 3.7.3, no changes needed.
Files: 
 20d48647fb6858afc836e88bdfd1c652 1144 libdevel optional cryptokit_1.3-7.dsc
 81b9f6e4d7688f8ef8692e4f101936c3 6153 libdevel optional cryptokit_1.3-7.diff.gz
 bdc3931c814c3635a29b59303884876a 30904 libs optional libcryptokit-ocaml_1.3-7_i386.deb
 1a2d8685aa7cc66b60e729a6f8b5f46f 334740 libdevel optional libcryptokit-ocaml-dev_1.3-7_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHbFFzIae1O4AJae8RAu1zAJ9DAvQ65xTF09f6AKr5NkmM/bxx+wCfSkZQ
9BrJHBuN7lJW6zT/eu5Zrgo=
=CeLK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: