On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 01:54:08PM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote: > If we change away from the foo / foo.opt naming scheme, I'd prefer to > make a "clean break" and adopt the .bytecode/.native approach. I > always thought the presence of both ocamlopt and ocamlc.opt was quite > confusing (and leads to abominations like ocamlopt.opt). I'd rather > see ocamlc{,.native,.bytecode} and ocamlopt{,.native,.bytecode}, etc. > > I suppose *.opt symlinks could be kept for a while for compatibility, > but I'd rather see them go away. Fully agreed, but we can't do such a change "just" in Debian. We need to convince upstream about that and I don't think it would be easy... -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature