Re: why and ergo

[Samuel Mimram <samuel.mimram@ens-lyon.org>]

Hi,

skaller wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 16:32 +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> skaller wrote:
>>> Before i put in a RTP, is there someone here willing to package
>>> why and ergo? [Assuming they're not packaged yet ..]
>> If they are useful at least for you, I'm ok to package them. I'll submit
>> ITPs soon (feel free to ping me if I forget to).
> 
> Thank you! I think these are both excellent programs, well worth
> having available in general. 'why' should 'recommends' ergo,
> they're sister products. 

Unfortunately, I found out that ergo is under the CeCILL license which
is not DFSG-free if I remember well (am I wrong?). So, I will go for why
only.

Cheers,

Samuel.