On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:05:02AM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> After reading this on the caml-list, I realized that my -dev libraries
> haven't been including .cmx files, nor do most of the other ocaml dev
> libraries I have installed. Shouldn't we change the packaging policy
> to recommend their inclusion?
This has been brought to my attention this morning as well :)
We can recommend it in the policy indeed (read: please patch the policy
accordingly), but I feel is more an issue of upstreams since we mostly
invoke upstream install targets.
What about wording it as: "you should ship .cmx since ..., if upstream's
install does not do that please push upstream a suitable patch" or
something like that ...
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature