Re: Could somebody check my first ocaml package ?
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 01:37:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> In particular, lintian and linda complain about the binary to be
> unstripped, but if I understand correctly, this is necessary. Shall I
> override the errors?
You should never strip a *bytecode* executable produced with the -custom
option (since this would remove the bytecod part of the executable). An
executable compiled in native mode, however, must be striped.
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
I just had a quick look and tried to build the package. What strikes me is
that the program is compiled twice. This is due to the fact that you use
"build" as a timestamp but then declare it as a .PHONY target. In fact
there is no reason to use an artificial timestap here. Instead,
depend on the produced binary.
> (PS: I am not subscribed to the list)
If you want to package ocaml packages then please consider susbscribing.
Regards -Ralf.
Reply to: