Re: [Caml-list] binary compatibility of 3.08.3
> Sure, and that is what we will have to do. This is a lengthy process though,
> and we had hoped to avoid this. This means not only changing the LIBDIR name,
> but also changing the virtual versioned package from ocaml-3.08 to
> ocaml-3.08.3, which our autobuilders still have trouble with.
Somehow I can't understand why someone would go through so much trouble
when using the name "3.09" instead of "3.08.3" would solve the problem much
more cheaply.
Stefan
Reply to: